Before You Book
How To Brief A Videographer So You Actually Get What You Want
ENTRY 012
READ 6 MIN
LOCATION WELLINGTON, NZ
The brief is where most projects are decided, long before anyone picks up a camera. And most briefs describe the wrong thing entirely: they describe what should be filmed, not what the film needs to do.
A brief that says “we need a video of our office and team” gives almost nothing to work with. A brief that says “we need something that makes a candidate choose us over a bigger competitor when they’re deciding between two job offers” gives everything: the audience, the emotional job, the comparison it’s competing against, and roughly how long someone will actually watch it.
What A Useful Brief Actually Contains
Four things, in order of importance: who is watching this and in what context (scrolling on a phone, sitting in a boardroom, on a website after already deciding to look the company up), what the audience should feel or do immediately after, where it’s going to live (a 6-second cutdown for a feed behaves nothing like a 3-minute film for a homepage), and what’s non-negotiable versus what’s genuinely open to a creative call.
That last point matters more than most people expect. Take a real estate brand running a monthly video subscription for its agents. The brief there isn’t “make our agents look good,” it’s a repeatable formula that has to work at volume, month after month, without a full creative reset every time. Compare that to a one-off narrative piece for a health charity, where the brief is closer to “make people feel something they don’t feel from a standard fundraising ask.” Same category of client relationship, completely different brief.
A good brief describes what success looks like to whoever has to justify the spend afterward.
Where Most Briefs Actually Go Wrong
Three patterns come up again and again. The first is adjective-heavy briefs: “professional,” “dynamic,” “high-energy.” These describe a feeling nobody can disagree with, and nobody can act on either. The second is a brief written for whoever’s approving the budget internally rather than the audience who’ll actually watch it, so the tone ends up serving a boardroom, not a customer. The third is skipping the “where does it live” question entirely, which quietly assumes a single video will do a job that actually needs three or four different cuts across three or four different contexts.
A Practical Way To Plan One
Writing a brief from a blank page is harder than it should be. A short, structured pass gets a long way:
Name the audience and the moment. Who’s watching, and what are they doing right before and after they watch it?
Name the one thing they should feel or do. Not three things. One.
List where it needs to live. Every platform and format changes what “the video” actually means.
Separate non-negotiables from open questions. What’s locked, and what’s genuinely up to a creative call?
Bring three reference videos. Any industry, with one sentence each on why they work. This says more than a page of adjectives.
The strongest process treats a brief as something to serve, not something to follow word for word. It holds the goal steady while staying flexible on how to get there. That balance, clarity on the outcome and flexibility on the execution, is what separates a brief that produces a good result from one that just produces a long list of instructions.
MY TAKE
My take: I’d rather get a rough, honest brief with a few real reference videos than a polished one full of adjectives. If it’s unclear where to start, skip the document entirely and just send three links with one sentence on each.
Try this: pull three videos already liked and write one line on why each works. That’s most of the brief done.
Spyro is a commercial DOP and videographer with over 10 years experience. See more here
HAVE A PROJECT IN MIND?